Entrywan App vs Fly.io
Compare Service Types, Runtimes, Execution Limits, Compliance, Regions and Alternatives
Features
Entrywan App
Service Types
Functions
Containers
Database
PaaS
N/A
Edge Compute
API as a Service
N/A
Fly.io
Service Types
Functions
Containers
Database
PaaS
Edge Compute
API as a Service
Entrywan App
Supported Containers
Docker
Docker Private Registry
Docker Swarm
Kubernetes
Managed Kubernetes
Fly.io
Supported Containers
Docker
Docker Private Registry
Docker Swarm
N/A
Kubernetes
Managed Kubernetes
Entrywan App
Supported Runtimes
.NET
Clojure
Crystal
Deno
Elixir
Go
Java
JavaScript
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Fly.io
Supported Runtimes
.NET
Clojure
Crystal
Deno
Elixir
Go
Java
JavaScript
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Entrywan App
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
256 MB
Max. Memory
8096 MB
Default Timeout
∞
Max. Timeout
∞
Request Payload
∞
Response Payload
∞
Fly.io
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
256 MB
Max. Memory
32 GB
Default Timeout
60 s
Max. Timeout
5 min
Request Payload
200 KB
Response Payload
∞
Entrywan App
Compliance
BAA
DPA
GDPR
HIPAA
PHIPA
SOC2
Fly.io
Compliance
BAA
DPA
GDPR
HIPAA
PHIPA
SOC2
Entrywan App
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
North America
Regions
N/A
Points of Presence
1
Fly.io
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
Regional + Global
Regions
NA, LATAM, EU, MEA, APAC
Points of Presence
16, 5, 8, 1, 5
Alternatives are matched on service types, programming languages and container support
