Exoscale vs Google Cloud Functions
Compare Service Types, Runtimes, Execution Limits, Compliance, Regions and Alternatives
Features
Exoscale
Service Types
Functions
Containers
Database
PaaS
IaC
Google Cloud Functions
Service Types
Functions
Containers
Database
PaaS
N/A
IaC
Exoscale
Supported Containers
Docker
Kubernetes
Managed Kubernetes
Google Cloud Functions
Supported Containers
Docker
Kubernetes
Managed Kubernetes
Exoscale
Supported Runtimes
.NET Core
C#
Go
Java
JavaScript
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Google Cloud Functions
Supported Runtimes
.NET Core
C#
Go
Java
JavaScript
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Exoscale
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
N/A
Max. Memory
N/A
Default Timeout
N/A
Max. Timeout
N/A
Request Payload
N/A
Response Payload
N/A
Google Cloud Functions
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
128 MB
Max. Memory
8 GB / 32 GiB
Default Timeout
60 sec
Max. Timeout
9 min / 60 min
Request Payload
10 MB / 32 MB
Response Payload
10 MB / 32 MB
Exoscale
Compliance
CSA STAR
GDPR
HIPAA
ISO 14001
ISO 27001
ISO 27017
ISO 27018
SOC 1
SOC 2
Google Cloud Functions
Compliance
CSA STAR
GDPR
HIPAA
ISO 14001
ISO 27001
ISO 27017
ISO 27018
SOC 1
SOC 2
Exoscale
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
Regional
Regions
NA, CH, APAC, EU, MENA
Points of Presence
2, 9, 8, 2, 1
Google Cloud Functions
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
Regional
Regions
NA, LATAM, EU, APAC
Points of Presence
23 / 40
Exoscale
Sustainabilty
Green Energy
Google Cloud Functions
Sustainabilty
Green Energy
N/A
Alternatives are matched by platform types, use cases, programming languages and deployment options
