Fermyon Cloud vs Fly.io
Compare Service Types, Runtimes, Execution Limits, Compliance, Regions and Alternatives
Features
Fermyon Cloud
Category
Hosted
FaaS
Compute
N/A
CaaS
DBaaS
PaaS
API Gateway
Fly.io
Category
Hosted
N/A
FaaS
N/A
Compute
CaaS
DBaaS
PaaS
API Gateway
Fermyon Cloud
Container Deployment
Docker
Docker Private Registry
Kubernetes
Managed Kubernetes
Fly.io
Container Deployment
Docker
Docker Private Registry
Kubernetes
Managed Kubernetes
Fermyon Cloud
Supported Runtimes
.NET
AssemblyScript
C
C#
C++
Clojure
Crystal
Deno
Elixir
Erlang
Go
Grain
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Motoko
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Scala
Swift
TypeScript
Wasm
Zig
Fly.io
Supported Runtimes
.NET
AssemblyScript
C
C#
C++
Clojure
Crystal
Deno
Elixir
Erlang
Go
Grain
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Motoko
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Scala
Swift
TypeScript
Wasm
Zig
Fermyon Cloud
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
128 MB
Max. Memory
32 GB
Default Timeout
30 sec
Max. Timeout
5 min
Request Payload
1 MB
Response Payload
1 MB
Fly.io
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
256 MB
Max. Memory
32 GB
Default Timeout
60 s
Max. Timeout
5 min
Request Payload
200 KB
Response Payload
∞
Fermyon Cloud
Compliance
BAA
DPA
GDPR
HIPAA
IDW PS 880
ISAE 3000
ISAE 3402
ISO 20000-1
ISO 27001
ISO 27018
ISO 9001
PHIPA
SOC2
WACA
Fly.io
Compliance
BAA
DPA
GDPR
HIPAA
IDW PS 880
ISAE 3000
ISAE 3402
ISO 20000-1
ISO 27001
ISO 27018
ISO 9001
PHIPA
SOC2
WACA
Fermyon Cloud
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
Global
Regions
N/A
Points of Presence
N/A
Fly.io
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
Regional + Global
Regions
NA, LATAM, EU, MEA, APAC
Points of Presence
16, 5, 8, 1, 5
Alternatives are matched by platform types, use cases, programming languages and deployment options
