Fermyon Cloud vs Juno
Compare Service Types, Runtimes, Execution Limits, Compliance, Regions and Alternatives
Features
Fermyon Cloud
Service Types
Decentralized
N/A
Hosted
BaaS
N/A
FaaS
CaaS
DBaaS
KV Store
N/A
PaaS
API Gateway
Juno
Service Types
Decentralized
Hosted
BaaS
FaaS
CaaS
DBaaS
KV Store
PaaS
API Gateway
Fermyon Cloud
Supported Containers
Docker
Juno
Supported Containers
Docker
Fermyon Cloud
Supported Runtimes
AssemblyScript
C
C#
C++
Clojure
Erlang
Go
Grain
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Motoko
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Scala
Swift
TypeScript
Wasm
WaSM
Zig
Juno
Supported Runtimes
AssemblyScript
C
C#
C++
Clojure
Erlang
Go
Grain
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Motoko
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Scala
Swift
TypeScript
Wasm
WaSM
Zig
Fermyon Cloud
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
128 MB
Max. Memory
32 GB
Default Timeout
30 sec
Max. Timeout
5 min
Request Payload
1 MB
Response Payload
1 MB
Juno
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
N/A
Max. Memory
N/A
Default Timeout
N/A
Max. Timeout
N/A
Request Payload
N/A
Response Payload
N/A
Fermyon Cloud
Compliance
IDW PS 880
ISAE 3000
ISAE 3402
ISO 20000-1
ISO 27001
ISO 27018
ISO 9001
WACA
Juno
Compliance
IDW PS 880
ISAE 3000
ISAE 3402
ISO 20000-1
ISO 27001
ISO 27018
ISO 9001
WACA
Fermyon Cloud
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
Global
Regions
N/A
Juno
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
N/A
Regions
Global (Internet Computer subnets)
Alternatives are matched by platform types, use cases, programming languages and deployment options
