Fermyon Wasm Functions
vs
Google Cloud Run
Compare Categories, Runtimes, Pricing, Regions and Alternatives
Features
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Category
Hosted
FaaS
CaaS
KV Store
Edge
Google Cloud Run
Category
Hosted
N/A
FaaS
CaaS
KV Store
N/A
Edge
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Container Deployment
Docker
Docker Private Registry
Google Cloud Run
Container Deployment
Docker
Docker Private Registry
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Supported Runtimes
.Net Core
AssemblyScript
C#
C++
Go
Grain
Groovy
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Scala
Swift
TypeScript
Wasm
Zig
Google Cloud Run
Supported Runtimes
.Net Core
AssemblyScript
C#
C++
Go
Grain
Groovy
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Scala
Swift
TypeScript
Wasm
Zig
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
N/A
Max. Memory
N/A
Default Timeout
N/A
Max. Timeout
N/A
Request Payload
N/A
Response Payload
N/A
Google Cloud Run
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
512MiB
Max. Memory
32GiB
Default Timeout
10min
Max. Timeout
24h
Request Payload
32MiB
Response Payload
∞
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
N/A
Regions
N/A
Points of Presence
N/A
Google Cloud Run
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
Regional
Regions
Global
Points of Presence
40
Alternatives are matched by category, runtimes, and hosting.
