Fermyon Wasm Functions vs Google Cloud Run
Compare Service Types, Runtimes, Execution Limits, Compliance, Regions and Alternatives
Features
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Service Types
Hosted
FaaS
Docker
KV
Edge
Google Cloud Run
Service Types
Hosted
N/A
FaaS
Docker
KV
N/A
Edge
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Supported Containers
Docker
Docker Private Registry
Google Cloud Run
Supported Containers
Docker
Docker Private Registry
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Supported Runtimes
.Net Core
AssemblyScript
C#
C++
Go
Grain
Groovy
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Scala
Swift
TypeScript
Wasm
Zig
Google Cloud Run
Supported Runtimes
.Net Core
AssemblyScript
C#
C++
Go
Grain
Groovy
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Scala
Swift
TypeScript
Wasm
Zig
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
N/A
Max. Memory
N/A
Default Timeout
N/A
Max. Timeout
N/A
Request Payload
N/A
Response Payload
N/A
Google Cloud Run
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
512MiB
Max. Memory
32GiB
Default Timeout
10min
Max. Timeout
24h
Request Payload
32MiB
Response Payload
∞
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
N/A
Regions
N/A
Points of Presence
N/A
Google Cloud Run
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
Regional
Regions
Global
Points of Presence
40
Alternatives are matched by platform types, use cases, programming languages and deployment options
