Fermyon Wasm Functions vs Google Cloud Functions
Compare Service Types, Runtimes, Execution Limits, Compliance, Regions and Alternatives
Features
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Service Types
Hosted
FaaS
KV
Edge
Google Cloud Functions
Service Types
Hosted
N/A
FaaS
KV
N/A
Edge
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Supported Runtimes
.NET Core
AssemblyScript
C#
C++
Go
Grain
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Swift
TypeScript
Wasm
Zig
Google Cloud Functions
Supported Runtimes
.NET Core
AssemblyScript
C#
C++
Go
Grain
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Swift
TypeScript
Wasm
Zig
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
N/A
Max. Memory
N/A
Default Timeout
N/A
Max. Timeout
N/A
Request Payload
N/A
Response Payload
N/A
Google Cloud Functions
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
128 MB
Max. Memory
8 GB / 32 GiB
Default Timeout
60 sec
Max. Timeout
9 min / 60 min
Request Payload
10 MB / 32 MB
Response Payload
10 MB / 32 MB
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
N/A
Regions
N/A
Points of Presence
N/A
Google Cloud Functions
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
Regional
Regions
NA, LATAM, EU, APAC
Points of Presence
23 / 40
Alternatives are matched by platform types, use cases, programming languages and deployment options
