Fermyon Wasm Functions
vs
Google Cloud Functions
Compare Categories, Runtimes, Pricing, Regions and Alternatives
Features
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Category
Hosted
FaaS
KV Store
Edge
Google Cloud Functions
Category
Hosted
N/A
FaaS
KV Store
N/A
Edge
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Supported Runtimes
.NET Core
AssemblyScript
C#
C++
Go
Grain
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Swift
TypeScript
Wasm
Zig
Google Cloud Functions
Supported Runtimes
.NET Core
AssemblyScript
C#
C++
Go
Grain
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Swift
TypeScript
Wasm
Zig
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
N/A
Max. Memory
N/A
Default Timeout
N/A
Max. Timeout
N/A
Request Payload
N/A
Response Payload
N/A
Google Cloud Functions
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
128 MB
Max. Memory
8 GB / 32 GiB
Default Timeout
60 sec
Max. Timeout
9 min / 60 min
Request Payload
10 MB / 32 MB
Response Payload
10 MB / 32 MB
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
N/A
Regions
N/A
Points of Presence
N/A
Google Cloud Functions
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
Regional
Regions
NA, LATAM, EU, APAC
Points of Presence
23 / 40
Alternatives are matched by category, runtimes, and hosting.
