Fermyon Wasm Functions vs IBM Cloud Functions
Compare Service Types, Runtimes, Execution Limits, Compliance, Regions and Alternatives
Features
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Service Types
Hosted
FaaS
Docker
KV
Edge
IBM Cloud Functions
Service Types
Hosted
N/A
FaaS
Docker
KV
N/A
Edge
N/A
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Supported Containers
Docker
IBM Cloud Functions
Supported Containers
Docker
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Supported Runtimes
AssemblyScript
C#
C++
Go
Grain
JavaScript
Kotlin
Node.js
PHP
Python
Rust
Swift
TypeScript
Wasm
Zig
IBM Cloud Functions
Supported Runtimes
AssemblyScript
C#
C++
Go
Grain
JavaScript
Kotlin
Node.js
PHP
Python
Rust
Swift
TypeScript
Wasm
Zig
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
N/A
Max. Memory
N/A
Default Timeout
N/A
Max. Timeout
N/A
Request Payload
N/A
Response Payload
N/A
IBM Cloud Functions
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
256MB
Max. Memory
2GB
Default Timeout
60s
Max. Timeout
10min
Request Payload
5MB
Response Payload
5MB
Fermyon Wasm Functions
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
N/A
IBM Cloud Functions
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
over 300 PoPs worldwide
Alternatives are matched by platform types, use cases, programming languages and deployment options
