Stackpath Serverless compared to Vercel

Stackpath Serverless
Versus
Vercel

Features

Edge Features of Stackpath Serverless compared to Vercel
Stackpath ServerlessFeaturesVercel
Functions / Serverless
C/++, Go, Javascript, PHP, Perl, Python, RustFunctions supported languagesNode.js, Go, Python, Ruby
Worker.js Environment
Docker support
Docker private registry
Kubernetes support
Managed Kubernetes
45 pops globallyAvailability regions23 Edge locations
Default Memory (MB)1024
Maximum Memory (MB)3008
Execution Time (ms)10,000
Maximum Execution Time (ms)900,000
Request Payload (MB)5
Response Payload (MB)5
Unsupported Paid Feature Supported Unknown

Descriptions


Stackpath Serverless


Stackpath’s dominant reign in the CDN space allowed space to expand their activity to the FaaS space.

Stackpath’s Sanbox environment to test functions works very fast and requires no registration, domain name or anything for that matter.

Having acquired at least 5 sizable companies in the last few years, it was only a waiting game before they announced to run serverless on their backbone-powered super fast infrastructure.

Having their own Backbone, Stackpath will be able to deliver on their promise to deliver at the microsecond.


Vercel


Formerly known as ZEIT, Vercel has a lot to offer in the serverless movement.

ZEIT was one of the pioneering companies at the time pushing Serverless technology. ZEIT’s first focus was to ease deployments, which resulted in the creation of Next.js.

Some of Vercel’s customers include AirBnB, Auth0, GitHub and the Washington Post.

Vercel announced a whopping $21M Series A funding early 2020.