Taubyte vs Google Cloud Functions
Compare Service Types, Runtimes, Execution Limits, Compliance, Regions and Alternatives
Features
Taubyte
Category
Self Hosted
FaaS
PaaS
IaC
Edge
Google Cloud Functions
Category
Self Hosted
N/A
FaaS
PaaS
N/A
IaC
Edge
Taubyte
Container Deployment
Docker
Docker Private Registry
Google Cloud Functions
Container Deployment
Docker
Docker Private Registry
Taubyte
Supported Runtimes
.NET Core
C
C#
Go
Java
JavaScript
Lua
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
TypeScript
Wasm
Google Cloud Functions
Supported Runtimes
.NET Core
C
C#
Go
Java
JavaScript
Lua
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
TypeScript
Wasm
Taubyte
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
∞
Max. Memory
∞
Default Timeout
∞
Max. Timeout
∞
Request Payload
∞
Response Payload
∞
Google Cloud Functions
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
128 MB
Max. Memory
8 GB / 32 GiB
Default Timeout
60 sec
Max. Timeout
9 min / 60 min
Request Payload
10 MB / 32 MB
Response Payload
10 MB / 32 MB
Taubyte
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
N/A
Regions
N/A
Points of Presence
N/A
Google Cloud Functions
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
Regional
Regions
NA, LATAM, EU, APAC
Points of Presence
23 / 40
Alternatives are matched by platform types, use cases, programming languages and deployment options
