wasmCloud vs Google Cloud Functions
Compare Service Types, Runtimes, Execution Limits, Compliance, Regions and Alternatives
Features
wasmCloud
Category
Self Hosted
FaaS
CaaS
IaC
Google Cloud Functions
Category
Self Hosted
N/A
FaaS
CaaS
IaC
wasmCloud
Container Deployment
Docker
Kubernetes
Managed Kubernetes
Google Cloud Functions
Container Deployment
Docker
Kubernetes
Managed Kubernetes
wasmCloud
Supported Runtimes
.NET Core
C#
Go
Java
JavaScript
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
TinyGo
typeScript
Wasm
Google Cloud Functions
Supported Runtimes
.NET Core
C#
Go
Java
JavaScript
Node.js
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
TinyGo
typeScript
Wasm
wasmCloud
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
N/A
Max. Memory
N/A
Default Timeout
N/A
Max. Timeout
N/A
Request Payload
N/A
Response Payload
N/A
Google Cloud Functions
Execution Limits and Resource Quotas
Min. Memory
128 MB
Max. Memory
8 GB / 32 GiB
Default Timeout
60 sec
Max. Timeout
9 min / 60 min
Request Payload
10 MB / 32 MB
Response Payload
10 MB / 32 MB
wasmCloud
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
Depending host
Regions
N/A
Points of Presence
N/A
Google Cloud Functions
Regional Availability
Deployment Scope
Regional
Regions
NA, LATAM, EU, APAC
Points of Presence
23 / 40
Alternatives are matched by platform types, use cases, programming languages and deployment options
